Home > Cloud Computing > Apparently In The Government You Can Have Your Cloud & Eat It, Too…

Apparently In The Government You Can Have Your Cloud & Eat It, Too…

I’m sure more details will emerge, but as written in Information Week, this story is just bizarre:

Less than a month and a half after coming out as federal cloud CTO, Patrick Stingley has returned to his role as CTO of the Bureau of Land Management*, with the General Services Administration saying the creation of the new role came too early. “It just wasn’t the right time to have any formalized roles and responsibilities because this is still kind of in the analysis stage,” GSA CIO Casey Coleman said in an interview today. “Once it becomes an ongoing initiative, it might be a suitable time to look at roles such as a federal cloud CTO, but it’s just a little premature.”

Cloud computing is a major initiative of federal CIO Vivek Kundra, and its importance was even outlined in an addendum to the president’s 2010 budget last month. Kundra introduced Google Apps to city employees in his former role as CTO of Washington, D.C., and has said that he believes cloud computing could be one way to cut the federal IT budget.

So Cloud Computing, despite all we hear about the Government’s demands for such services as a critical national initiative is “…still kind of in the analysis stage” and isn’t at the “…right time to have any formalized roles and responsibilities”?


While Stingley is no longer the formal federal cloud CTO, he has by no means turned his attention away from cloud computing. As of last Thursday, he was still scheduled to give a presentation titled “Development Of A Federal Cloud Computing Infrastructure” at the Geospatial Service-Oriented Architecture Best Practices Workshop on Tuesday morning, though as CTO of the BLM, not as a representative of the GSA.

The GSA isn’t by any means taking its foot off the accelerator with cloud computing. However, Coleman wants to make sure it’s done in the right way. “As we formalize the cloud computing initiative, we will have a program office, we will have a governance model,” she said.

Despite the elimination — for now — of the federal cloud CTO role, Coleman said that it’s “fair to say” that the GSA will be taking a central role in pushing the Obama administration’s cloud computing initiative, noting that the GSA should be a “center of gravity” for federal government IT.

Perhaps this was simply lost in GovSpeak translation, but something does not compute here.  I’m very much for correcting missteps early, but what an absolutely confusing message to send: Cloud is uber-important, we’re moving full-steam ahead, but nobody — or at least not the GSA — is steering the ship?

What could go wrong?

Whether it was decided that the GSA was not the appropriate office to lead/govern the Federal Cloud efforts, they are amongst the most innovative:

The GSA is experimenting with cloud computing for its own internal use. For example, federal information Web site USA.gov is hosted via Terremark’s Enterprise Cloud infrastructure as a service product, which charges by capacity used. When it was time for renegotiation of its old hosting contract, the GSA opened the contract to bidders and ended up saving between 80% and 90% with Terremark on a multiyear contract worth up to $135 million.

It’s also possible that under the Obama administration, the GSA might begin playing more of a shared-services role in IT, as it does in building management. However, Coleman is coy about whether that’s likely to happen, saying only that it would depend on the goals of the administration and the incoming GSA administrator. Stingley is reported to have been thinking about how the GSA might build out a federal cloud that agencies could easily tap into.

There’s a back-story here…


* Aha!  I figured it out. See the problem is that you can’t appoint the CTO from something called the Bureau of LAND Management and expect them to be able to manage CLOUDS!  Silly me!

  1. June 9th, 2009 at 12:36 | #1

    Sounds to me like it's translated into normal-person speak as "we're waiting for our leadership to give us rules of engagement for cloud offerings". Right now, the administration is playing 2-faced cloud games with the agencies: we're not going to give you any official guidance for the time being and you're free to go do some projects with cloud services. Good way to have the carpet pulled out from under you later when you least expect it, so the CIOs are staying away right now, with some exceptions.

    The new motto should be "Nobody ever got fired for not going to a cloud solution."

  2. Real Story
    April 23rd, 2011 at 10:40 | #2

    Congrats! You are the ONLY one writing about a "back-story". Has anyone ever worked with this ego-maniac, Patrick Stingley? The real story is it has less to do with the importance of cloud in the government and more to do with the individual they selected. They should have done more research into this guy's personality and realized that he really thought he was a Czar!

    Dig deeper guys, you will see it is about the individual and not the role.

  1. June 10th, 2009 at 06:10 | #1